Two journeys. A shared purpose.
They know the pressure.
They care about the person.
Reading a play, responding under pressure, trusting your preparation: Mario and Matt know what competition demands. Together, they bring that understanding to conversations athletes can carry into everyday life.
THE CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
Mario WilcoxLMSW · Founder, Wilcox Wellness
From Division I linebacker to a career helping people find their footing.
Mario’s journey into therapy is rooted in lived experience. His public bio describes growing up in the child welfare system and learning how much emotional support matters. That perspective informs his work as a licensed therapist and mental-health advocate.
Through Wilcox Wellness, he offers individual therapy, organizational workshops, and mindset education. His work emphasizes self-awareness, navigating trauma, and practical emotional skills. His football background adds firsthand understanding of the expectations athletes face.
Meet Mario at Wilcox Wellness ↗
THE ATHLETE & ADVOCATE
Matt LawrenceFormer NFL player · Founder, 32 Sports
An NFL platform. A purpose that reaches far beyond football.
Matt’s path through the Baltimore Ravens and professional football became a platform for service. After a career-changing concussion, he stayed connected to Baltimore’s young people and built on a family example of helping others.
Through 32 Sports and school outreach, he connects athletic experience with conversations about resilience, belonging, and asking for help. In mental-health assemblies with For All Seasons, his message to students centered on facing challenges with support from their community.
The mission: bridge the gap between professional athletes and youth.
The case for philanthropic investment
Fund access. Strengthen delivery.
Build accountable evidence.
The opportunity is to connect clinical perspective and credible athlete mentorship with structured learning in a community that already gathers around sport. Four Quarters’ distinctive proposition is the integration of those assets. Whether that combination improves outcomes, for whom, and at what cost are questions a responsible funding partnership can help answer.
01Equitable access
Proposed support for subsidized places, team-based access, and participation accommodations. Track who enrolls, who completes, and which practical barriers remain.
02Quality of delivery
Support facilitator preparation, a documented curriculum, supervised delivery, and checks that intended skills are actually taught and practiced.
03Continuity of support
Resource follow-up and clearly defined routes to qualified mental-health care. Athlete mentorship and wellness education serve different functions from clinical treatment.
04Independent evaluation
Fund an evaluator, an agreed analysis plan, and transparent reporting of benefits, null findings, attrition, and cost. These are proposed funding priorities, not completed program outcomes.
A proposed evaluation framework
Agree on the primary outcome and age-appropriate validated measures before enrollment. Collect baseline, end-of-course, and 8–12-week follow-up data. Keep feasibility, skill acquisition, well-being, and sport performance analytically distinct.
What funding should make possible to assess| Domain | Proposed measures | Decision it informs |
| Reach & equity | Enrollment denominator, subsidized places, completion, and reasons for withdrawal; subgroup analysis only where sample size and privacy permit. | Who the program reaches and who needs a different delivery model. |
| Delivery & skill use | Session attendance, practice frequency, facilitator fidelity, and demonstrations of regulation and attentional skills. | Whether the intended learning experience was delivered and used. |
| Well-being & recovery | Validated, age-appropriate stress or well-being scales, sleep indicators, and access to further support. | Whether participants improve, remain unchanged, or need additional care. |
| Persistence & value | Follow-up skill use, missing follow-up data, delivery cost per participant and per completer. | Whether benefits persist and whether expansion is operationally sustainable. |
For credible attribution: where feasible, randomize teams or use a prespecified comparison group, account for clustering, and report effect sizes with confidence intervals. Pre/post improvement alone cannot separate program effects from maturation, season timing, selection, or regression to the mean.
This is a proposed evaluation design. Consent and assent, confidential reporting, clinician-led escalation, and independent ethical review where applicable should be built into any study. Individual mental-health data should not become a selection or playing-time criterion.
What the evidence supports todayA research-informed rationale for the four components and a testable case for their integration. No independently evaluated Four Quarters outcome dataset is presented here. Claims of clinical efficacy, prevented injuries, college offer gains, financial returns, or long-term impact require program-specific evidence.